The sheer cost of providing quality health care makes universal health care a large expense for governments. Medical coverage must be paid for by taxpayer-funded programs. A substantial portion of countries around the world have UHC, including Canada, much of Europe, Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, along with Australia and New Zealand. The U.S. has the distinction of being the only wealthy, industrialized nation without universal health care.

Types of Universal Health Care Models

Universal health care can work in several different ways, depending on the exact system. There are three main universal health care models: single payer, mandatory insurance, and national health insurance. 

Single-Payer Model

In a single-payer system, the government provides free health care paid for with revenue from income taxes. Services are government-owned and service providers are government employees. Every citizen has the same access to care. This is called the Beveridge Model.   When governments provide health care, they work to ensure doctors and hospitals provide quality care at a reasonable cost. To do this, government agencies must collect and analyze data and use their purchasing power to influence health care providers. The United Kingdom helped advance the single-payer health care system with its National Health Service, in which the government not only pays for health services, but runs hospitals and employs doctors.  Other single-payer-based countries include Spain, New Zealand, and Cuba. The United States offers it to veterans and military personnel with the Department of Veterans Affairs and the armed forces.

Social Health Insurance Model

Countries that use a social health insurance model require everyone to buy insurance, usually through their employers. Employers deduct taxes from employee payrolls to cover the costs, and the taxes go into a government-run health insurance fund that covers everyone. Private doctors and hospitals provide services. The government controls health insurance prices. It also has a lot of clout to control the private providers’ prices. Germany developed this system, which is also known as the Bismarck model. France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Japan, and Switzerland also use it. In the U.S., meanwhile, the Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare,” also requires insurance, but there are many exemptions, and this rule is no longer enforced by penalties. It is also similar in that it provides subsidies to health insurance companies for low-income enrollees.

National Health Insurance

The national health insurance model uses public insurance to pay for private-practice care. Every citizen pays into the national insurance plan. Administrative costs are lower because there is one insurance company. The government also has a lot of leverage to force medical costs down.  Canada, Taiwan, and South Korea, for instance, all use this model. The U.S. Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE systems are based on a national health insurance approach.

Pros and Cons of Universal Health Care

Pros Explained

Lowers overall health care costs: The government controls prices through negotiation and regulation. Certain costs can also be lowered because of universal access to preventive care, which can head off problems before they become serious and much more expensive to treat. It reduces the need for expensive emergency room usage, which some patients are forced into when they have no access to preventive care. This health care inequality is a big reason for the rising cost of medical care. May lower administrative costs: If doctors only deal with one government agency, their costs can be a lot lower. For example, a 2011 study found that U.S. doctors spent four times as much as Canadians dealing with insurance companies. Standardizes service: In a competitive environment like the U.S., health care providers must also focus on profit. They do this by offering the newest technology. They also offer expensive services and pay doctors more, which drives up costs and can limit health care for the less wealthy. A universal system takes away the profit motive and focuses on providing equal care for all.  Prevents future social and health costs: Preventive care can prevent future health issues and improve outcomes in the most vulnerable communities. Guides the population toward healthier choices: Better investment in health care, health infrastructure, and public education can help push the population toward healthier choices and lifestyles. 

Cons Explained

Healthy people pay for the care of the sickest: Chronic diseases and mental illness make up 90% of health care costs. According to Brookings research, the half of the population that uses the least health care accounts for only 3% of total (including out-of-pocket) expenditures (excluding long-term care and some other components of spending), while the top 1% accounts for 22%. However, this is true to some extent even outside of universal health care systems, as spending on chronic diseases will raise the cost of private health insurance plans as well.Possibly less financial incentive to stay healthy: In systems where this is no copay, people might overuse emergency rooms and doctors.Long wait times: The government focuses on providing basic and emergency health care, so wait times for elective procedures can be much longer. Some care might have to be foregone. Doctors incentivized to cut care to lower costs: Government cost-cutting can lead to reduced availability of care. For example, doctors reported Medicare payment cuts in 2018 would force them to close many in-house blood testing labs.Costs may overwhelm government budgets: Health care costs make up a significant portion of government budgets. For example, on average, Canadian provinces spend almost 40% of their budgets on health care.Government may limit services with a low probability of success. This includes drugs for rare conditions and expensive end-of-life care. In the United States, care for patients in the last year of life makes up between 13% and 25% of the Medicare budget.

Examples of 6 Developed Countries With UHC

Here is a look at the UHC systems in some of the world’s developed nations, and their costs.

Australia

Australia has a mixed health plan. The government provides public health insurance, called Medicare, and runs public hospitals. Everyone receives coverage, and people must pay deductibles before government payments kick in. If you earn above a certain level of income, you must also purchase private hospital coverage or pay a tax surcharge. Many residents are willing to pay for additional private health insurance to receive a higher quality of care. Government regulations protect seniors, people considered economically disadvantaged, children, and rural residents. As of 2020, health care cost 10.6% of Australia’s gross domestic product (GDP). The per capita cost was US$5,627, slightly above average for developed countries. Wait times for elective surgeries ranged from 17 days for a coronary bypass to 209 for knee replacement. Australia’s infant mortality rate is 3.2% in 2020.

Canada

Canada has a national health insurance system. The government pays for services provided by a private delivery system. Private supplemental insurance pays for vision, dental care, and prescription drugs. Hospitals are publicly funded. They provide free care to all residents regardless of their ability to pay. The government keeps hospitals on a fixed budget to control costs, but it reimburses doctors at a fee-for-service rate.  In 2021, health care cost 11.7% of Canada’s GDP. The cost per person was US$5,905. Wait times for elective surgeries ranged from six days for a coronary bypass to 122 for knee replacement. The infant mortality rate was 4.5% in 2020.

France

France has a social health insurance system that provides care to all legal residents. That includes hospitals, doctors, drugs, and some dental and vision care. It also pays for homeopathy, spa treatments, and nursing home care. As of 2016, payroll taxes funded 64% of the costs, income taxes paid for 16%, and 12% came from taxes on tobacco, alcohol, the pharmaceutical industry, and private voluntary health insurance. As of 2020, health care cost 12.2% of GDP. That was US$5,468 per person. The infant mortality rate was 3.6%. These statistics are all in the middle of the pack for developed nations. 

Germany

Germany has a social health insurance program. Everyone who earns less than a certain amount must have public health insurance, but people earning more can choose private insurance instead. The state-sponsored insurance covers hospitalization, except for meals and accommodation. It also covers rehab for hospital stays, mental health, addiction, and long-term care. Funding comes from premiums paid by employees and their employers. As of 2021, health care cost 12.8% of GDP. It averaged US$7,383 per person. Both figures are the highest among industrial countries outside of the U.S. In addition, most Germans can get next-day or same-day appointments with general practitioners. The infant mortality rate was 3.1%. 

Switzerland

Switzerland has a social health insurance system for all residents. Coverage is provided by competing private insurance companies. Residents pay premiums, and the government provides income-based subsidies to some. People can buy supplemental insurance to access better hospitals, doctors, and services not covered by mandatory insurance. As of 2020, health care spending was 11.8% of GDP. It was USD $7,179 per person. In 2021, the infant mortality rate was 3.2%. 

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has single-payer health care that covers all residents. The National Health Service (NHS) runs hospitals and pays doctors as employees. As of 2016, the government paid nearly 80% of costs through income and payroll taxes. The rest was paid from copayments and people paying out-of-pocket for NHS services. The NHS pays for most medical care, including some dental and eye care, hospice care, and some long-term care. Copays are required for outpatient medications. As of 2021, health care costs accounted for 11.9% of GDP. The cost was US$5,387 per person. Wait times ranged from 55 days for a coronary bypass to 98 days for knee replacement. The infant mortality rate was 3.6% in 2020. 

Comparing Universal Health Care to the U.S. System

The United States has a mixture of government-run and private insurance.   As a result, in 2021, 66% of Americans had private health insurance, mostly from their employers. The government subsidizes private health insurance through Obamacare. Another 35.7% of Americans had public government coverage. This includes Medicaid, Medicare, Children’s Health Insurance Program, and military coverage including the Veterans Administration (VA). Only 8.3% had no coverage at all. All health care service providers, except for the VA, are private. Some democratic candidates have promoted universal health care under the title “Medicare for All.” In 2021, health care cost a staggering $12,318 per capita in the U.S., or 17.8%. These costs are the highest of those reported in 53 countries by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The U.S. infant mortality rate was 5.4% in 2020, significantly higher than that of countries such as Australia, Germany, and all other developed countries reported on by the OECD.